How to Spot Bogus Health News


        There are numerous reasons for shoddy
health care reporting.  

    •  Journalists have to meet publishing deadlines
despite the time needed to do in-depth research.
    •  Increasingly articles are valued by publishers
for their click bait appeal over their content value.
    •  A fuzzy line between the interest of the
advertizing departments and editorial oversight.

        The result is an increasing number of articles
posing as critical articles that are little more than
advertisements in disguise.  Perhaps you read one
of the headlines below and wondered, “Is it true?”

    •  “Drinking wine is better than exercise”
    •  “Coffee and Cheesecake Cure Cancer”
    •  “Eating Right and Exercising Solves 90% of   
Health Problems”

    Would you know how to identify the misleading
news report?  It’s not that hard if you know what to
look for.  Here are a few pointers.          


     First ask, was this a human Study?

        If the research was conducted on animals or in
a laboratory culture, the findings may be interesting
but can't yet be known to apply to humans.  
Discovering how a dozen mice respond is only a first
step in testing a new idea. Often chemicals, drugs,
foods, etc. have different effects on people.  
Complicating factors are numerous. Because
something works in a lab doesn't mean that it'll work
in real world situations. And, just because something
works in a lab doesn't mean that it'll work in the
same way outside of a lab.


Know that correlation is not causation

        With modern day computers, it’s possible to
find thousands of things that are statistically related.
While these correlations are interesting that doesn't
mean that one thing caused the other.   It just
means there is a possible association, which could
be worth further investigation.  A strong correlation
could mean any one of several things
    •  Maybe one thing did cause the other

    •  Maybe something else caused both

    •  Maybe a combination of events were
responsible

    •  Maybe they only appear related but are in fact
not related.

    • Or, maybe another reason

    • Or, maybe it means nothing.

        Examples of intriguing claims for correlation
abound and serve as a warning when this is the
best claim a news report can offer.  For an
abundance of humorous correlations visit the
Spurious Correlations web site.


            Is the story one-sided?

        Rarely do advances in medicine happen
without tradeoffs between the positive and negative
effects of a treatment. In short, a news report that
extols only the positive is suspicious. For example, a
story that talks about the accuracy of a medical test,
should also talk about the rate of false-positives.  
Few tests work 100% of the time.  It’s important to
know how often a test indicates a person has a
disease when they don't actually have it.  A story
that only reports on accuracy but says nothing
about false positives (specificity) is most likely not
giving you the information needed to make an
informed judgment about how useful the test is in
real life. In general, if it sounds too good to be true it
probably is.


        Is the New Finding Affordable?

        Few treatments are cost free or risk free.
Without a price tag, many treatments sound
amazing. You may have noticed that few health care
stories about new innovations mention cost.  Often,
new high cost treatments aren’t covered by
insurance.  Usually there is a span of several years
between when a treatment is announced and when
insurance companies deem them covered as non-
experimental.


          Are the sources credible?

        A red flag is an article based on findings by
one person.  Even more suspicious is an article
promoting the sale of a product based on one expert’
s testimony.  The more trustworthy health articles
will have multiple sources that aren’t connected to
the articles author or product promoted. In general,
single-source stories are suspect. Of course, the
person quoted should be a person qualified to
speak about the nuances of practical treatments.  
An academic researcher is often far more optimistic
than a practicing physician.  Similarly, a quote from
a person in a related field might be accurate or just
an opinion.  For an entertaining and educational
critic of medical news visit the Health News Review
where a recent article titled “7 Reasons That Beer is
Good for You” is debunked.”  You get the idea - if it
sounds too good, beware.


           
Who Were the Subjects?

        Many researchers are associated with
colleges and use college students for their studies.
This is often the case in psychology research.  How
college students respond may be quite different
than people in their 30s, 40, 50s and 60s.  
Complicating these limited studies is lack of data
across population in terms of age, race,
socioeconomic status, etc.  Granted, many of these
studies are interesting.  Whether useful or not in the
real world is typically a work in progress.


                 To Learn More

        Care to learn more about spotting accuracy
issues in healthcare news?  Learn more from
“Health News Review's 10 Criteria” and  Vox’s
article, “Why So Many of the Health Articles You
Read Are Junk.’
        
        In the age of Dr. Google with trillions of health
facts on-line you have reason to be confused.  One
article may suggest you have nothing to be
concerned about and the next gives you six months
to live. Sorting out the myths from the evidence
based knowledge can be challenging.   Fortunately,
that’s what doctors are trained to do.  If your heads
spinning from Googling a medical question then
maybe you need a walk to settle your mind.  Join me
Saturday morning and we’ll talk about it.

       Nancy Neighbors, MD
      Huntsville, Alabama


 Medical Headlines We Wish Were True

        We are bombarded daily with fake news and
negative headlines touting advances in healthcare.

        What positive health headline would you like to
see? Below are a few we would like to see.

•  Consumption of Chocolate Grants Eternal Youth
•  Lawyers Repent for Frivolous Healthcare Litigation
•  Dr. Oz Admits He Was Wrong About Everything
•  Illegal Drug Industry Apologizes For Mess Created
•  New Drug Reverses All Causes of Dementia
•  More Patients Take Responsibility for Their Health
•  Vascular and Thoracic Surgery Patients Quit
Smoking
•  More Losing Weight, Stopping Smoking, and
Walking
•  Congress Will Follow Same Ethics as Doctors
•  Coffee and Cheesecake Cure Cancer
•  Malpractice Attorneys Converted to Useful
Members Of Society
•  Liability Insurance Industry Disbanded For Lack
Of Need
•  Top Brass in Hospitals Help Patients Instead of
Bottom Line
•  New Pill Helps Politicians Work for Common Good
•  Politeness Pill Helps DMV Employees
•  Drinking Wine is Better Than Exercise
•  Millions Responding to Medical Lifestyle Advice

        For the record, all of these headlines are
unlikely in the near future and for sure a glass of
wine is not a substitute for exercise nor is coffee and
cheesecake a cure for cancer.   

        “More patients walking with the Doc” would
make a good headline.  You could make it happen!
Just join me Saturday mornings.  Perhaps you have
a humorous imaginary headline to share or a real
one you’ve recently noticed?  Bring it along.  Humor
is good medicine.